Participation In A Continuous Offence
In acts committed without interruption, the fact that completion and completion are different results in terms of attempt
arises. It is possible to apply the provisions of the undertaking until completion.
After its completion, as completion is realised although the execution continues
There is no question of an attempt. Therefore, effective remorse from this moment onwards
provisions are applicable (Article 110 of the TPC).
Uninterrupted offences are also characterised in terms of participation. Single perpetrator system is accepted in offences
Since there is no distinction between perpetrator and accomplice, as long as the offence continues to be committed without interruption,
i.e. participation is possible until the offence is completed. Both until the offence is completed and after its completion
It is possible for joint perpetrators to be joint perpetrators until the end of the offence. Joint perpetrators shall be joint perpetrators until the end of the offence.
does not have to continue his/her actions. Continue their actions after the completion of the offence
joint perpetrators are also realised in the event that they do not do so. Other persons after the completion of the offence
may participate in the execution of the offence as a joint perpetrator.
Ensuring that the perpetrator who commits an uninterrupted offence commits the offence again after the interruption has occurred
will constitute instigation. In order for the perpetrator to continue committing the offence before the interruption occurs
activities will be characterised within the scope of helping,
Legitimate defence against this act because there is an attack due to the continuation of the execution of the act
possible.
It is important that the offence is uninterrupted in terms of the place and time of the offence. More on these issues
The statute of limitations shall start from the date of the deduction.
You can access our other article examples and petition examples by clicking here.