8. Criminal Department 2021/7635 E. , 2021/16240 K.
“text of jurisprudence”
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
CRIME : Misuse of someone else’s debit or credit cards
SENTENCE : Conviction
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
According to the existence and scope of the file; the defendant seized the driver’s license containing the identity information of the participant, who is a relative, and pasted his own photo, and Fortisbank A.By applying for a credit card use this card in a concrete case s in order, allegedly, the defendant in stages using a relative out of this credit card, which is not out of the Join to participate in debt because of the presence of this by stating that he paid the debt arising from the use of the credit card refuses to accept blame, if the attendee’s declaration dated 26.03.2012; your own driver’s license without the permission of his brother, the defendant sent through the Shield of War later in this document field, specify the subject of a crime during the investigation phase of the expert report received from outside the subject of the contract are not related to the trial and given fortisbank dated 29.08.2003, Dışbank Card being related to handwriting and signature on the application form in response to Ideal; for the purpose of determining the defendant does not doubt the truth in a way that by using the credentials of 2008 after attending fortisbank credit card application and exists whether or not it issued a credit card and documents, and reference is made to the written text to be asked to fortisbank laid out in whose name the credit card after the submission of the application form or the contract documents, the defendant or of the signatures in expert review of the attendee’s hand as to whether the product is done, who issued the credit card on what date it was delivered, the provision of the respective courier company Delivery documents where necessary getting done on this document examination, the defendant’s brother, War shield by referencing the attendee’s knowledge and manners as witnesses is sent in place of the defendant’s driver’s license to be asked as to where, because of the use of a credit card statement after evaluating all the evidence by researching at the base of the expenditure according to the results, without considering the need of the decision and judgment of the defendant’s legal status, incomplete research, written with the establishment of provisions,
Contrary to the law, since the defendant’s appeals have been considered in place as of this date, the provisions are therefore in accordance with Section 8/1 of Law 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.of 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on the day of 16.06.2021.