The Measure Is In Demand
ADANA SENTINEL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Prosecutor :
Attorney :
THE DEFENDANTS :
LATE :
SUBJECT : It consists of a request to cancel the will of the Murisin and, if not, to decide on his criticism.
INSTRUCTIONS :
……. 1. For the opening of the will in the form of an arrangement of the Notary’s Office dated 04.08.2015 and numbered 1581 evmiye ………… 2016/198 E of the Magistrate’s Court. 2016/363 K. His case has been appealed by us and is still pending. Due to the fact that the client lives abroad, he was only able to receive the notification. The client was unable to attend the hearing on the opening of the will, but appealed the decision and was legally informed of the will in question.
The client’s wife passed away on 04.05.2016. As the legal heirs left behind; his wife ….., kids ……….., ……….. and ……….he has left the. In our opinion, there are violations of law and procedure in the will filed after death and its cancellation is required. Let me just say … ;
Murisin’s will, filed on 13.04.2016, states that he owns in his own name, ……. the province ……….. County …….. mah. 291. the owner of 1/2 of the entire share of the masonry house located on 26 parcels, including after the death of his/ her own share ………… 1/2 and ………… it turns out that he left. As the reason for this in the will, “to date, these two daughters of ours have taken care of us, they are the ones who have shown interest and possibility to us.” expressed in the form of.
A moment of resentment at the murisin of the will in question, anger and other heirs ……… and ………… it is clear that he gives under pressure. Muris is a person who receives a pension both from abroad and from Turkey. Again, other heirs also reside abroad. Muris has been living on his own two feet in Turkey for a long time. As it can be seen from this situation, Muris has not been in a state of disrepair. He took care of everything himself. Before Muris died, while he was ill, he said that he wanted to return from this will and that he regretted it. But the client has found out about this already. Again, there is a will/savings (oral or written) that we assume is in the wife of the murisin, who is again the legal heir, regarding the return of the murisin from the said will. Therefore, as a matter of nature, the will subject to this case is invalid.
In addition, when we look at the will, the report that the mental angels of the murisin are sufficient was taken from the family doctor. This report is not valid. It should not be respected. muris has undergone heart surgery. It is a well-known scientific fact that emotionality increases after surgery in people who have undergone heart surgery. The report describing Murisin’s emotional state dec a moment of anger and pressure from my sisters should have been received from a full-fledged state hospital, especially from a delegation including a psychiatric specialist. Otherwise, the received report does not indicate that the bride has a mental condition, mental weakness. Therefore, the will issued without the report we are talking about is incomplete and crippling in nature, as well as irregular in form. In addition, when we examine the will, it will be clear that Murisin is an illiterate person. The witnesses in the will must testify that Murisin is both illiterate and emotionally absent-minded, and that he left the above-mentioned real estate to only his two daughters in order to be in good mental health. Therefore, we request that the witnesses in the will be invited to a hearing by your Honor’s court and heard on these issues.
The defendants ensured that such a transaction took place in favor of Murisin by using the reasons that crippled his will, which we explained above, by dragging him into error. Because there is no reason why Muris should deprive his other heirs of this by leaving the entire of his own house mentioned above to only his two daughters. Murisin’s will was mutilated by the defendants and Murisin’s wife, and they misled Murisin and carried out this operation. The defendants and the Murisin’s wife still reside in this inherited house. Again, the defendants use all the items in this house left by Murisin. The plaintiff client could not even take any personal belongings left by his late father that reminded him of him. The plaintiff client has also been victimized in this case and wants his/her share of the belongings left from his/her late father.
In addition to the reasons we have submitted, there are also the inheritance receivables of the plaintiff client and the legally protected reserved shares. Therefore, this will also encroaches on the plaintiff client’s reserved shares, and therefore the revocation of the will is also required.
For these reasons, we are obliged to apply to your Honor’s court for the cancellation of the will and, if not, for its approval.
LEGAL REASONS: TMK, HMK and other legislation
Subsequently can be obtained legal evidence and counter-evidence report, without prejudice to the right to civil register of probate decree hospital records, doctor’s notes and recipes, ……… Journal number and date of 1581 noterligi 04.08.2015 Editing in the form of a will, Deed recording, witness statements, ………… Magistrates ‘ Court 2016/198 E. 2016/363 K. a numbered file, an Oath, an Expert Witness, and all kinds of other evidence.
CONCLUSION-I REQUEST :
For the reasons described above and which you will observe if you re;
1. first of all ………. province …………… County ……… mah. 3. real estate of the nature of a masonry house located on parcel 291 island 26. The Establishment of an Injunction to prevent transfer to persons,
2-………… If it is not possible to cancel the will in the form of an arrangement with the Notary’s Office dated 04.08.2015 and numbered 1581 evmiye due to the fact that it is against the law, the plaintiff’s criticism at the rate of his/ her reserved share will be decided,
I will submit and request an estimate of the costs of the trial and the attorney’s fee to the counterparty. (date)