A defect imposed on one spouse in divorce cases also applies to the other spouse in another event. Since the decisions of the Supreme Court are made according to concrete events, the phrases “man” or” woman” are used. It should not be assumed that there is a difference. In the current incident, it was seen that the wife who refused to meet with some relatives of the man and did not visit the holiday was considered defective. You can review the sample Supreme Court Decision.
Law Office
Part Number: 2016/4522
Decision Number: 2017/9803
“text of jurisprudence”
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE : Divorce
At the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties, the judgment given by the local court, the date and number shown above, was reviewed and considered by the plaintiff man in terms of deciphering defects, compensations and alimony appreciated by the woman; and the defendant woman appealed in full, the documents were read and discussed as necessary:
In the case petition, it is necessary to show clear summaries of all the cases that are the basis of the plaintiff’s claim under the ordinal number (HMK m. 119/1-e). The court cannot independently examine cases that have not been duly substantiated by the plaintiff. The cause and basis of the lawsuit The cases should be clearly and concretely proven and put forward in a manner conducive to the defense of the counterparty.The court decided to accept the case on the basis of the case ”the defendant woman did not want to meet with some relatives of the man and visit him on a holiday”, which was not duly brought forward by the plaintiff man. In addition, the defendant woman’s defective behavior, which requires a divorce, has not been proven. According to the situation that has taken place, while the decision to dismiss the case should be made, the decision to accept the case in writing was not found correct and required overturning.
CONCLUSION: It was decided unanimously that the appealed decision should be OVERTURNED for the reason shown above, that there is no place for examining the appeals of the plaintiff man according to the reason for the violation, that the advance fee for the appeal should be returned to the depositors on request, within 15 days of the notification of this decision, the way to correct the decision will be open. 21.09.2017 (Prs.)