Criminal Complaint For Perjury
TO THE … PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
NEAR :
ADDRESS :
AGENT :
ADDRESS :
SUSPECT :
CRIME :
DATE OF OFFENSE : …/…/…
A P A R T I C A T I O N S
1- The client is a business person engaged in construction/contracting works. One of the parties, the client as a contractor, and the suspect and the suspect’s siblings as floor owners on the other side, agreed on the demolition of the real estate in which they are shareholders and the construction of a new real estate in its place, and the parties all went to the notary public together ……. …. …………. with the date of February 2011 and …Journal Number Contract in line with their demands and they signed this contract together.
2- Pursuant to the contract, the old building belonging to the suspect and his siblings was demolished by the client and a new construction was built in its place and separate apartments were delivered to the beneficiaries. However, the suspect’s siblings claimed that the new building was defective and that some incomplete works were done, and they filed a lawsuit against my client ……. …. ……. of the Civil Court of First Instance The suspect was shown as a witness by us at the hearing of the case dated …….. and was called to the hearing. The suspect … was called to the hearing by us as a witness because we think that the suspect … will not lie and will tell everything he witnessed truthfully, even though he is a brother and sister with the plaintiffs in the file where he will testify.
3- The suspect, although his statement was taken under oath “on his honor, dignity and all the beliefs and values he considers sacred”, despite the fact that he was the one who took delivery of the apartments subject to the case, and that he also knew who and how the apartments in question were disposed of, he said that he did not know some of the issues he knew and confirmed with his signature, or declared that things that happened did not happen, and things that did not happen as if they had happened despite the contrary.
4- In his witness statement, the suspect stated that he signed a delivery contract, that he examined the building to be delivered, even if it was procedurally, and although he admitted in the hearing that he signed this report voluntarily, and although he also confirmed the facts with his own signature, we are of the opinion that he made a false statement in court and misled the justice.
LEGAL GROUNDS : 5237 S. K. art. 209 and related legislation.
LEGAL EVIDENCE : Witness statements, all other favorable evidence
CONCLUSION AND REQUEST
For the reasons explained above and to be taken into consideration ex officio, we respectfully request and demand on behalf of our client that a public case be opened for the prosecution of the person to be punished by conducting an investigation against the person due to the fact that the statements, which we claim to be partially and completely false, consisting of the 5 items we have summarized, harm the establishment of justice, and that the witness acts contrary to the facts he knows by not recanting his statement when we persistently ask questions despite his perjury and untruthful statements, and that it prevents the prosecution of the trial. …/…/…
Deputy Complainant
………………..