Objection To The Ranking List
If the creditor who objects to the ranking list not only claims that the rules of the law of enforcement have been applied incorrectly, but also objects to the receivables of a creditor included in the ranking list or to the ranking of that creditor, the creditor must file an objection against the ranking list before the general courts, in short, the creditor must file a lawsuit against that creditor. Here, the plaintiff is the creditor who objects to the claim or the rank of the creditor included in the order list. The defendant, on the other hand, is the one whose claim or order is objected. If the debtor can file a complaint against the order list, he/she does not have the right to file an objection against the order list.
The Supreme Court has stated in some of its decisions that “which objections are related to the substance and amount of the receivable” and therefore should be notified to the general court in the form of an objection case against the order list. For example:
“If the plaintiff has objected to the amount of his/her own receivable, the dispute will have to be resolved in the general court, the claim that the receivable recorded in the order list should be removed from the order list due to the statute of limitations will be examined in the general court, and the claim that the creditor’s receivable in the order list should be removed from the order list will be examined in the general court”. If no complaint or objection is made to the order list within 7 days, the order list becomes final and the rights to sue and complain are lost.